Damaged brands are one that loses its value because it is no longer a unique label. Many factors contribute to this disaster, but most of them are caused by mass production, excessive advertisement, and plagiarsm. Brands that are identified as ‘damaged’ often doesn’t see an immediate sales drop, however, in a long term they are losing their mojo. It is a slow but eroding process.

Nike is a prime example of damaged brand. It used to be a leading brand for sporting fashion thanks to it’s agressive advertising and the cool ‘tick’ logo, but that was last century, now we see the tick everywhere. Nike’s products are no longer special, it’s just a sporting goods, and nothing else. Nike also suffers a colossal brand-loss due to colossal copycat products emerging from everywhere. Funnily enough, Nike’s copycat is almost as cheap as original Nike’s product.

Calvin Klein also falls into damaged brand category because we start seeing cK brands almost everywhere. Established in 1968, Calvin Klein used to be an exclusive yet edgy fashion piece, but again that was last century. Now ordinary people wears cK tees everyday, regardless they are real or fake. Other high-end fashion brands that suffers from similar issues includes Versace and Louis Vuitton (bags). Also, while not exacly a fashion item, Hard Rock Cafe also suffers from damaged-brand issue.

“You’ve been to Tokyo’s branch of Hard Rock Cafe. So what? 68% chance they are fake, or you get that from somebody else.”

Interestingly, damaged-brand issue is not international product’s domain. Local brands, including Dagadu and Joger are seeing the symptoms of damaged-brand epidemic, mainly due to overproduction, copycat, and outadated theme. Hugo’s nightclub (they prefer to call it a cafe, but really, its a nightclub)—which reached it’s popularity in Jogja because its logo sticking in every clubber’s windshied—starting to sicken its target market when people start imitating its logo to ‘HaPe’s’ and ‘Bejo’s’.

Damaged Brands
Tagged on:

7 thoughts on “Damaged Brands

  • January 1, 2006 at 4:04 pm
    Permalink

    How about “Gama” brand ? We can see lots of brand using “Gama” prefix/suffix, such as “Primagama”, “Gama Informatika”, “Tekno Gama”..etc.

    Most of them are education/learning institution that tend to mislead their customers perception to Gadjah Mada University (Gama).

    But Swaragama, GamaWisata, Gamatechno, GamaBookPlaza …etc. These brands are actually related to Gadjah Mada. *sigh*

    Reply
  • January 1, 2006 at 11:54 pm
    Permalink

    Yaahh…
    Nike kan keren.. :(

    Reply
  • January 3, 2006 at 2:16 pm
    Permalink

    baru tau.. gama = gajah mada

    Reply
  • January 4, 2006 at 2:57 am
    Permalink

    SMA GAMA = SMA tiGA MAret..

    ada semacam syndrom sepertinya..
    hayo coba temukan yg lainnya

    Reply
  • November 16, 2008 at 7:16 pm
    Permalink

    asyik kalau ingat jogja, n ingat waktu sekolah disana.
    saiap kepseknya? masih bu sun ya

    Reply
  • January 19, 2010 at 9:43 am
    Permalink

    copycat copycat copycat.

    copycat is the keyword that we’re looking for. copycat-lah yg ngerusak image barang2 (yg seharusnya) berkelas tsb.

    tidak berlaku buat pengguna & pengamat brand sejati though. karena orang yg pake nike ato CK beneran biasanya tau betul kalo liat nike/CK palsu.

    ex: harley davidson. kodiannya udah dimana2; kaos, stiker, logo, lighter, etc. tapi harley asli masih terkenal mahal & orang2 tau betul bahwa itu barang bagus :)

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.